| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jsiegers Could work for Apple

Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Moe,
We're not even able to log out.
Do you also have a large extent count?
The problem is with Xsan software for the client. We've been talking to Apple about this bug. But I don't know if it's fixed in Xsan 2.3
Jasper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moe Xsan Master

Joined: 04 May 2006 Posts: 61
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi jsiegers
| Quote: | We're not even able to log out.
Do you also have a large extent count? |
I haven't tested this, I'm not sure if I'm seeing the same problem you're having
Our MDC is StorNext based with some special attributes, I'm not sure how well xsanDefrag can check it, will look for another way on the server side
The customer does seem to be using large size Prores files, so it's likely to have many extents
But it's random, the same project might open once fine, then doesn't the next time!
| Quote: | The problem is with Xsan software for the client. We've been talking to Apple about this bug. But I don't know if it's fixed in Xsan 2.3
|
In our case FCP seems to be the only app affected
FCP can be frozen, while if you play the same clip in the timeline from Quicktime ( while FCP is spinning ) it plays back fine!
So Quicktime works
The application Smoke doesn't seem to be affected as well
The thing is, when FCP does this, the whole system acts ugly, a reboot through the power button seems the only way to solve this |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsiegers Could work for Apple

Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
When a file is heavily fragmented the machine requires more memory. We've noticed that on 10.5 only FCP is affected but sometimes when you wait long enough (15 minutes) the project is loaded like nothing ever happened.
I know (but haven't seen it myself) that on 10.6 the Finder should be affected as well.
You could simply check the extent count even on StorNext systems by using the snfsdefrag -c command like this:
| Code: | | snfsdefrag -c /Path/to/your/file |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wrstuden Xsan Master

Joined: 04 Jan 2008 Posts: 99
|
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| dmastroluca wrote: | | But the plot thickens on the user called FFFFEEEEE-DDDD-CCCC-BBBB-AAAA820480. I created a test folder on the san. I added my admin (501) to the ACL with RW permissions. When I checked back later on the permissions of that test folder the admin user was replaced by a user called FFFFEEEEE-DDDD-CCCC-BBBB-AAAA820480 with RW access. Again, not sure if this is causing THE problem, but this does not look kosher. Why would the admin user change to garbage? |
Do
NOT
use non-OD users in Xsan ACLs.
Don't.
ACLs need common users across the SAN. Specifically they need coherent SIDs across the SAN. Local users don't have SIDs, and even if they did, they aren't coherent across the SAN. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsiegers Could work for Apple

Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
And there was much rejoicing: Apple has released Xsan 2.2.2 which resolves all our issues!
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4804 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mw10dot1 Xsan Master

Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 106
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:53 am Post subject: 10.6.8 |
|
|
Hi jsiegers
Where you running 10.6.8? As the posts from apple have two different requirements. One says 10.6 the other says 10.6.8
thanks
Michael |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsiegers Could work for Apple

Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
We have yet to install this update.
Have to plan some downtime first.
Apple said to me that you'd have to have 10.6.8 for this update.
We're now running 10.6.7 on the servers and 10.5.8 on our clients.
We can now finally upgrade our clients to 10.6.8 now this is fixed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomwelch Been around the blocks

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all.
I think I can say that this is affecting me too!
Where it gets really annoying for me is that we re-share our Xsan volume from two APF servers. These are the machines that gets the spinning wheel and 'empty' folders. Of course this has a knock on affect to the 50-70 AFP connections on any given day. The afp process gets stuck and all connections get a spinning beach ball in their finders. Sometimes the AFP servers will kernal panic, sometimes I have to force them off.
I've been running jsiegers' script (great job by the way) and we have number of files with high extends.
Right now we're getting this a few times a week! So I'm considering running the 2.2.2 update this weekend. We only have 2 MDCs and 3 clients (all Xserves). Everything is running OS X Server 10.6.7 and Xsan 2.2.1.
If I backup my servers system volumes before updating to 10.6.8 + Xsan 2.2.2, and it all goes wrong, I can just restore my backups right? Anybody know if the 2.2.2 update alters the Xsan file system content? Obviously, I'll have a full backup!!!
We've had this problem for quite some time (it's been progressively getting me frequent) so heres hoping this update fixes it!
Finally, has anyone already installed this update?
Thanks for all the posts! I'm now (slightly) happier that I know whats going on, and that it's not just me.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jsiegers Could work for Apple

Joined: 21 Oct 2008 Posts: 41
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Tom,
I'd suggest that you defrag your system first. That way you don't have the spinning wheel for now.
Than make images of your servers. That way you can easily go back.
I've been testing a preview build of this version and I've found it very smooth and stable. But please test it first if you can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomwelch Been around the blocks

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi jsiegers
Thanks for replying!
Unfortunately we don't have a Xsan test environment. I usually hold off for a few months to see what others report about new updates but in this case I'm not sure we can.
Am I right in thinking that repeated defragmentation is not recommended on an Xsan volume? I'm tempted to run your script say once a week? As it only defrags individual files do you think that will be OK?
Thanks.
t. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abstractrude Xsan Master

Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 863
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I had a customer that i fought with for months about this once. eventually they listened to me and didnt fill their volume up, problem went away. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomwelch Been around the blocks

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| abstractrude wrote: | | I had a customer that i fought with for months about this once. eventually they listened to me and didnt fill their volume up, problem went away. |
Hi abstractrude
We're currently at 80% capacity. To me thats not 'full' but I guess in Xsan terms there could be a little more free space. As a rule we aim not to drop below 20% free space, hence I'll be doing some archiving this weekend.
As we have a backup Xsan volume too keeping much more free space than this gets a bit costly. Currently there is 7TB of free space on both volumes. Would you recommend much more?
Tom. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
abstractrude Xsan Master

Joined: 13 Mar 2008 Posts: 863
|
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| yes but at once point it wasnt. and eventually freespace fragmentation affects your entire filesystem. my only point is. i have SANS that have a 2 year uptime and if you check a file for extents, it has 1. i would pull all your data off and rebuild your volume for good measure. if thats not possible constantly running defrag will only make things worse. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomwelch Been around the blocks

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks abstractrude. I actually rebuilt the volume from scratch about three months ago and added more storage. This is the first time the volume has got down to 20% free space. With the backup volume it's not too hard to redo though so maybe I'll do it again. What kind of free space do you recomend?
| abstractrude wrote: | | i have SANS that have a 2 year uptime |
Something to aspire to!
Thanks,
t. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tomwelch Been around the blocks

Joined: 30 Sep 2009 Posts: 25
|
Posted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
So, over the weekend I didn't get to run the 2.2.2 update for various reasons. I did however, mainly our of curiosity, run jsiegers's script on our backup SAN volume. This volume is cloned using PresSTORE. It is identical in setup and hardware to the live volume. There is no where near as much fragmentation on the backup volume and that got me thinking.
Next I preformed some tests putting files on the SAN via the AFP server and directly. Anything added to the volume via an AFP share ends up being fragmented, anything added directly to the volume is fine.
Has anyone else seen this with re-sharing?
Thanks in advance,
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|