Xsanity Sanity for Apple's Xsan and Final Cut Server.
  
Tuesday, May 21 2013 @ 08:02 PM EDT
Topics
Storage (39)
People (1)
Xsan (103)
How To (26)
User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
Who's Online
xsanguy
Guest Users: 10
Sponsorship

Xsanity is proudly sponsored by:

Tekserve
The Old Reliable Mac Shop

Finder crashes after xsan finder copy, Apple is stumped
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Xsanity Forums Forum Index -> Troubleshooting
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jsiegers
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 3:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Moe,

We're not even able to log out.
Do you also have a large extent count?

The problem is with Xsan software for the client. We've been talking to Apple about this bug. But I don't know if it's fixed in Xsan 2.3

Jasper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Moe
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 61

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi jsiegers

Quote:
We're not even able to log out.
Do you also have a large extent count?


I haven't tested this, I'm not sure if I'm seeing the same problem you're having

Our MDC is StorNext based with some special attributes, I'm not sure how well xsanDefrag can check it, will look for another way on the server side

The customer does seem to be using large size Prores files, so it's likely to have many extents

But it's random, the same project might open once fine, then doesn't the next time!

Quote:
The problem is with Xsan software for the client. We've been talking to Apple about this bug. But I don't know if it's fixed in Xsan 2.3


In our case FCP seems to be the only app affected

FCP can be frozen, while if you play the same clip in the timeline from Quicktime ( while FCP is spinning ) it plays back fine!
So Quicktime works
The application Smoke doesn't seem to be affected as well

The thing is, when FCP does this, the whole system acts ugly, a reboot through the power button seems the only way to solve this
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jsiegers
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2011 4:49 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When a file is heavily fragmented the machine requires more memory. We've noticed that on 10.5 only FCP is affected but sometimes when you wait long enough (15 minutes) the project is loaded like nothing ever happened.

I know (but haven't seen it myself) that on 10.6 the Finder should be affected as well.

You could simply check the extent count even on StorNext systems by using the snfsdefrag -c command like this:

Code:
snfsdefrag -c /Path/to/your/file
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
wrstuden
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 99

PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2011 12:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

dmastroluca wrote:
But the plot thickens on the user called FFFFEEEEE-DDDD-CCCC-BBBB-AAAA820480. I created a test folder on the san. I added my admin (501) to the ACL with RW permissions. When I checked back later on the permissions of that test folder the admin user was replaced by a user called FFFFEEEEE-DDDD-CCCC-BBBB-AAAA820480 with RW access. Again, not sure if this is causing THE problem, but this does not look kosher. Why would the admin user change to garbage?


Do

NOT

use non-OD users in Xsan ACLs.

Don't.

ACLs need common users across the SAN. Specifically they need coherent SIDs across the SAN. Local users don't have SIDs, and even if they did, they aren't coherent across the SAN.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jsiegers
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:21 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

And there was much rejoicing: Apple has released Xsan 2.2.2 which resolves all our issues!

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4804
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mw10dot1
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 06 Dec 2006
Posts: 106

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:53 am    Post subject: 10.6.8 Reply with quote

Hi jsiegers

Where you running 10.6.8? As the posts from apple have two different requirements. One says 10.6 the other says 10.6.8

thanks

Michael
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jsiegers
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have yet to install this update.
Have to plan some downtime first.

Apple said to me that you'd have to have 10.6.8 for this update.
We're now running 10.6.7 on the servers and 10.5.8 on our clients.
We can now finally upgrade our clients to 10.6.8 now this is fixed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwelch
Been around the blocks
Been around the blocks


Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 3:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi all.

I think I can say that this is affecting me too!

Where it gets really annoying for me is that we re-share our Xsan volume from two APF servers. These are the machines that gets the spinning wheel and 'empty' folders. Of course this has a knock on affect to the 50-70 AFP connections on any given day. The afp process gets stuck and all connections get a spinning beach ball in their finders. Sometimes the AFP servers will kernal panic, sometimes I have to force them off.

I've been running jsiegers' script (great job by the way) and we have number of files with high extends.

Right now we're getting this a few times a week! So I'm considering running the 2.2.2 update this weekend. We only have 2 MDCs and 3 clients (all Xserves). Everything is running OS X Server 10.6.7 and Xsan 2.2.1.

If I backup my servers system volumes before updating to 10.6.8 + Xsan 2.2.2, and it all goes wrong, I can just restore my backups right? Anybody know if the 2.2.2 update alters the Xsan file system content? Obviously, I'll have a full backup!!!

We've had this problem for quite some time (it's been progressively getting me frequent) so heres hoping this update fixes it!

Finally, has anyone already installed this update?

Thanks for all the posts! I'm now (slightly) happier that I know whats going on, and that it's not just me.


Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jsiegers
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 21 Oct 2008
Posts: 41

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi Tom,

I'd suggest that you defrag your system first. That way you don't have the spinning wheel for now.
Than make images of your servers. That way you can easily go back.

I've been testing a preview build of this version and I've found it very smooth and stable. But please test it first if you can.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwelch
Been around the blocks
Been around the blocks


Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi jsiegers

Thanks for replying!

Unfortunately we don't have a Xsan test environment. I usually hold off for a few months to see what others report about new updates but in this case I'm not sure we can.

Am I right in thinking that repeated defragmentation is not recommended on an Xsan volume? I'm tempted to run your script say once a week? As it only defrags individual files do you think that will be OK?

Thanks.


t.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abstractrude
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 863

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had a customer that i fought with for months about this once. eventually they listened to me and didnt fill their volume up, problem went away.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwelch
Been around the blocks
Been around the blocks


Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 10:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

abstractrude wrote:
I had a customer that i fought with for months about this once. eventually they listened to me and didnt fill their volume up, problem went away.

Hi abstractrude

We're currently at 80% capacity. To me thats not 'full' but I guess in Xsan terms there could be a little more free space. As a rule we aim not to drop below 20% free space, hence I'll be doing some archiving this weekend.

As we have a backup Xsan volume too keeping much more free space than this gets a bit costly. Currently there is 7TB of free space on both volumes. Would you recommend much more?


Tom.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
abstractrude
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 863

PostPosted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 5:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes but at once point it wasnt. and eventually freespace fragmentation affects your entire filesystem. my only point is. i have SANS that have a 2 year uptime and if you check a file for extents, it has 1. i would pull all your data off and rebuild your volume for good measure. if thats not possible constantly running defrag will only make things worse.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwelch
Been around the blocks
Been around the blocks


Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Sat Sep 03, 2011 5:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks abstractrude. I actually rebuilt the volume from scratch about three months ago and added more storage. This is the first time the volume has got down to 20% free space. With the backup volume it's not too hard to redo though so maybe I'll do it again. What kind of free space do you recomend?

abstractrude wrote:
i have SANS that have a 2 year uptime

Something to aspire to!

Thanks,


t.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tomwelch
Been around the blocks
Been around the blocks


Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 25

PostPosted: Mon Sep 05, 2011 7:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So, over the weekend I didn't get to run the 2.2.2 update for various reasons. I did however, mainly our of curiosity, run jsiegers's script on our backup SAN volume. This volume is cloned using PresSTORE. It is identical in setup and hardware to the live volume. There is no where near as much fragmentation on the backup volume and that got me thinking.

Next I preformed some tests putting files on the SAN via the AFP server and directly. Anything added to the volume via an AFP share ends up being fragmented, anything added directly to the volume is fine.

Has anyone else seen this with re-sharing?

Thanks in advance,


Tom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Xsanity Forums Forum Index -> Troubleshooting All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 5 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Best Viewed on a Mac | Suggested Browser: Whatever floats yer boat.