Xsanity Sanity for Apple's Xsan and Final Cut Server.
  
Friday, May 24 2013 @ 08:25 AM EDT
Topics
Storage (39)
People (1)
Xsan (103)
How To (26)
User Functions
Username:

Password:

Don't have an account yet? Sign up as a New User
Who's Online
Guest Users: 12
Sponsorship

Xsanity is proudly sponsored by:

Tekserve
The Old Reliable Mac Shop

Live studio Ingest to Xsan (Prores422)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Xsanity Forums Forum Index -> Software
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
abstractrude
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 864

PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 4:09 pm    Post subject: Live studio Ingest to Xsan (Prores422) Reply with quote

I have a siutation where a happy xsan with a bunch of client machines now has a studio that needs to ingest live from the studio into the xsan. I have looked at b4m but i'm wondering what others are doing. Would like to take the baseband in (HD-SDI) and digitize it into the SAN in some sort of automated way. I would really like to hear how people are using studio cameras with Xsan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bs3375
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 02 Jul 2008
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Wed Mar 17, 2010 7:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We have several setups using Gallery's PictureReady! but I think only one is actually doing scheduled ingests ... to a NAS (just in case that makes a difference for you).

My company was an early integrator of B4M and assisted in setting up the original system at CNN during the salad days of Xsan 1.0 running on OS X Panther. It was a good solution then [and now] but their pricing is confusing.

I don't know if I answered your question or not, but whatever you choose make sure you get vmeter for QoS if you intend on sharing a volume between live ingest and post production. Editors scrubbing in the timeline can and will cause drop frames on capture if you don't account for it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jfw
fully protected
fully protected


Joined: 07 Mar 2010
Posts: 10

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Gallery's PictureReady! has advantages in simplicity (if all you need is capture), but it has a smaller company supporting it.

B4M's FORK is much more fully featured, which can be both good & bad.

There's also Softron, BUG.tv, and Telestream's Pipeline. And if you only have occasional needs it might be OK to just use FCP manually.

So it depends on the specifics of your needs. B4M usually meets the needs for traditional television broadcast end-to-end workflows, whereas the others can be more point solutions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
abstractrude
Xsan Master
Xsan Master


Joined: 13 Mar 2008
Posts: 864

PostPosted: Mon Mar 22, 2010 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks for all the suggestions.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
d4corp
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Posts: 50

PostPosted: Tue Mar 23, 2010 8:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

you should try tools on air products, you'll just love them Smile

http://www.toolsonair.com/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bs3375
Could work for Apple
Could work for Apple


Joined: 02 Jul 2008
Posts: 47

PostPosted: Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry for hijacking the thread, but does anyone know if tools on air supports AMP?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Xsanity Forums Forum Index -> Software All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Best Viewed on a Mac | Suggested Browser: Whatever floats yer boat.